The remaining Defendant, United States of America, has filed an Unopposed Motion for a time extension to file their response to “ASD Justice” opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. They cite their reasons as follows:
Despite that the undersigned intended to file the defendant’s reply on or before June 28, due to other case related time commitments, the undersigned simply has not had time to dedicate to preparation of the defendant’s reply. The defendant needs a couple of additional days in which to draft and file a reply.
The defendant seeks until Monday, July 2, 2012 in which to file its reply to the plaintiffs’ objection to the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
Consistent with the Local Rules, a proposed order will be sent to the court. WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, the defendant hereby requests until Monday, July 2, 2012, in which to file its reply to the plaintiffs’ objection to the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
It’s encouraging to see that at least one side of this case actually follows the Local Rules. I will be checking the docket on PACER this Monday to get a copy of the Defendant’s response, it ought to be good.