Achieve: Kristine Johnson Enters Guilty Plea

achieve-community-logoAfter the Magistrate Judge asked a bunch of questions, Kristine Johnson and her attorney signed the Entry and Acceptance of Guilty Plea.  Here’s Doc 8 for those who want to read it.

Details of the $25,000 unsecured Appearance bond and the Conditions of Release are restricted.

TelexFree: Sann Rodrigues Arrested After Posting Bond??

This comes from the “el Nuevo Herald” and is translated from Portuguese.  There may be a few grammatical errors, but the story is very interesting, to say the least! Our thanks to for the information.


US: Brazilian detain involved in scam

Zeek Rewards: Civil Case Against Kevin Grimes is Closed

The case is listed as Closed as of June 25th:


Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Settlement Agreement previously approved by this Court on June 3, 2015, Plaintiff hereby dismisses this action with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs.

Respectfully submitted this 24TH day of June, 2015.

Robert L. Craddock’s Guilty Plea for Wire Fraud

CASE NO: 6:15-cr-49-Orl-31DAB


Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 32), the parties having filed Notices of No Objection thereto (Docs. 33 and 34), the plea of guilty of the defendant to Counts One and Two of the Indictment is now accepted and the defendant is adjudged guilty of such offenses. A sentencing hearing has been scheduled for September 14, 2015, under separate notice.

DONE and ORDERED at Orlando, Florida this June 29, 2015.

TelexFree: Sann Rodrigues Released on $200,000 Bond

sann-rodrigues-top-telexfree-investorAs of June 26th, Sannderley Rodrigues de Vasconcelos is released from custody on the following

  1. Must not violate federal, state or local laws while released
  2. Must cooperate in DNA sample if collection authorized by 42 USC 1413a
  3. Must advise Court in writing if address of phone number changes
  4. Promises to appear in court as required and surrender for any sentencing imposed
  5. Executed a $200,000 secured bond binding the defendant for failure to appear or surrender for imposed sentence
  6. Must report to PTS (pretrial services) as directed
  7. Must surrender passport
  8. Obtain no passport
  9. Travel restricted to MA and FL, maintain residence and do not move without prior approval.        report any contact with LEO with 24 hours
  10. Participate in mental health test/treatment as directed by PTS
  11. Home incarceration – 24 hour lock down except for medical or court appearances
  12. Location monitoring as required by PTS
  13. Must comply with 14-cv-11858 Civil Injunction; If court finds any assets moved, court will           deem this as evidence of preparing to flee and violate this order of release.

The next document lists the Penalties and Sanctions for violating conditions of release:


Zeek Rewards: Canadian Catherine Parker Advances Nonsensical Pro Se Theory (?)

In a letter filed on the 23rd, Catherine Parker is trying to say the Default Judgment entered does not zeeklermatter, somehow. As you might recall, the Judgment entered was for $213,953.13.  And it seems Ms. Parker is using an often mentioned, but never successful, nonsensical argument about capitalizing letters, in an almost “sovereign citizen-like” manner.

I especially like the last 2 sections, number 16 and 17, “provide me with your Oath”  and “If you don’t answer me, you have admitted to fraud”. What a moron…..

Talk about bat-shit crazy. No one has ever won with this type of nonsense. And, she failed to sign this letter. Which sort of makes it a moot point, doesn’t it? Here’s what she is advancing:


Note: Capitis diminutio maxima – The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights

Capitis diminutio minima  – consisting of the loss of a person’s family relations alone. The right to liberty and citizenship are unaltered here; there is only a minimum loss of status.









TelexFree: Sanderley Rodrigues de Vasconcelos Remains in Custody

In proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler, Rodrigues, the proclaimed top earner in TelexFree,  made his initial appearance sann-rodrigues-top-telexfree-investoron June 1st. The matter was continued while counsel explored the issue of a Bond. Rodrigues was remanded to the custody of the US Marshals Service (USMS). A bail hearing was scheduled for the following week.

On June 8th, the Bail Review Hearing was held, also before Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler. The Court heard arguments on conditions, but Defendant Rodrigues was once more remanded to the USMS until an SEC accounting or alternate funds are made available for bail.

There is a Detention Hearing scheduled for June 26th.

Robert Craddock Enters Guilty Plea Today, Sentencing to Follow

The Change of Plea Hearing scheduled today when off as expected, with Robert Craddock officially entering a plea of Guilty and signed the Consent form changing the plea. In addition to the Plea change, Craddock also consented to a Pre-sentence Investigation by probation officers and that this investigation report will be disclosed to the Judge and US Attorney, as well as Craddock and his federal public defender.

There was also a “Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty” filed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker, detailing that Craddock was cautioned and examined under oath, that the Judge determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the charging offenses are supported by independent basis in fact. Magistrate Judge Baker further recommended that the plea agreement and plea of guilty be accepted, and that the defendant be adjudged guilty and sentence imposed accordingly. Craddock will remain on conditions of release pending sentencing.

At the bottom of this R&R, there is a Notice that failure to file a written objection to this Report and Recommendation “within fourteen (14) days from date of service will bar any aggrieved party from attacking such Report and recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge.”

And, filed the same day as this Report and Recommendation is a “Notice of No Objections to Report and Recommendation” by the Assistant US Attorney. Nothing yet from Craddock or his public defender.

Robert L. Craddock Enters Plea Agreement

Looks like Craddock has pleaded guilty to 2 Counts of Wire Fraud, and is scheduled for a Change of Plea Hearing set for 6/22/2015 at 2:00 PM in Orlando Courtroom 6 D before Magistrate Judge David A. Baker.

Here are a few bits from the Plea Agreement:


Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c), the United States of America, by A. Lee Bentley, lll, United States Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, and the defendant, ROBERT LEE CRADDOCK, and the attorney for the defendant, Stephen Baer, Esq., mutually agree as follows:
A. ParticularizedTerms

1. Counts Pleading To
The defendant shall enter a plea of guilty to Counts One and Two of the lndictment. Counts One and Two charge the defendant with wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. S 1343.

2. Maximum Penalties
Counts One and Two each carry a maximum sentence of twenty years of imprisonment, a fine of $250,000, a term of supervised release of not more than three years, and a special assessment of $100 per felony count for individuals. With respect to certain offenses, the Court shall order the defendant to make restitution to any victim of the offenses, and with respect to other offenses, the Court may order the defendant to make restitution to any victim of the offenses, or to the community, as set forth below.

3. Elements of the Offenses
The defendant acknowledges understanding the nature and elements of the offenses with which defendant has been charged and to which defendant is pleading guilty. The elements of Counts One and Two are:

First: The Defendant knowingly devised or participated in a scheme to defraud, or to obtain money or property by using false pretenses, representations, or promises;
Second: The false pretenses, representations, or promises
were about a material fact;
Third: The Defendant acted with the intent to defraud; and
Forth: The Defendant transmitted or caused to be transmitted by wire some communication in interstate commerce to help carry out the scheme to defraud.

4. No Further Charges
lf the Court accepts this plea agreement, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida agrees not to charge defendant
with committing any other federal criminal offenses known to the United States Attorney’s Office at the time of the execution of this agreement, related to the conduct giving rise to this plea agreement.

And there is a lot more available from the link above.

1 2 3 138